Clinical Trial: Videophone Administered Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Study Status: Completed
Recruit Status: Completed
Study Type: Interventional

Official Title: Videophone Administered Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Brief Summary: Although cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is the most effective intervention for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), many people do receive CBT initially. Given this, alternative ways of providing CBT need to be identified and tested. With this in mind, the proposed study examines the efficacy of a videophone based cognitive-behavioral intervention for youth with OCD. A total of 30 youth will be randomly assigned to either videophone administered CBT or an abbreviated wait-list control arm. Comprehensive assessments will be conducted by trained clinicians at relevant time-points to assess symptom severity and impairment.

Detailed Summary: Although cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is the most effective intervention for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), many people do receive CBT initially due, in part, to the lack of trained providers and geographic barriers (e.g., distance to such providers). Rather, the majority of youth with OCD receive psychiatric medication alone or together with unproven forms of psychotherapy. While some serotonergic medications have demonstrated utility in pediatric OCD, side effects can be common, response rates are modest at best, and symptom remission is rare. Given this, alternative ways of providing CBT need to be identified and tested to increase the number of people with access to this form of treatment. With this in mind, the proposed study examines the efficacy of a videophone based cognitive-behavioral intervention for youth with OCD. A total of 30 youth will be randomly assigned to either videophone administered CBT or an abbreviated wait-list control arm. Cognitive-behavioral therapy will be based on a demonstrated effective treatment protocol, and adapted for videophone administration. Comprehensive assessments will be conducted by trained clinicians at relevant time-points (e.g., baseline, post-treatment, follow-up) to assess symptom severity and impairment. Should supporting data be found, videophone-administered CBT would have the potential to help many more families who would otherwise remain untreated or inadequately treated. On a societal level, evaluation and dissemination of telehealth interventions such as this will lessen costs related to sustained treatment and OCD related impairment.
Sponsor: University of South Florida

Current Primary Outcome: Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS; Scahill et al., 1997). The CY-BOCS is a 10-item Semi-structured Measure of Obsession and Compulsion Severity Over the Previous Week. This Measure Will Serve as the Primary Outcome Index. [ Time Frame: within one week after treatment condition was concluded ]

Items on this scale are summed to arrive at a total score. Scores on this scale range from 0 to 40 with higher scores corresponding to worse symptom severity.


Original Primary Outcome: Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS; Scahill et al., 1997). The CY-BOCS is a 10-item Semi-structured Measure of Obsession and Compulsion Severity Over the Previous Week. This Measure Will Serve as the Primary Outcome Index. [ Time Frame: Screening, Baseline, Post-treatment, Follow-up at 3 months ]

Current Secondary Outcome:

  • Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S; National Institute of Mental Health, 1985). The CGI-S is a 7-point Clinician Rating of Severity of Psychopathology. [ Time Frame: within one week after treatment condition was concluded ]
    Scores on this scale range from 0 to 6 with higher scores corresponding to worse symptom severity.
  • Clinical Global Improvement (CGI; Guy, 1976). The CGI is a 7-point Rating of Treatment Response Anchored by 1 ("Very Much Improved) and 7 ("Very Much Worse"). [ Time Frame: within one week after treatment condition was concluded ]
    Scores on this scale range from 1 to 7. Scores of 1 (very much improved) and 2 (much improved) are grouped together to indicate if a participate has had a beneficial response to the interview. The data represents participants who had a beneficial response to the treatment condition. Scores of 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse) and 7 (very much worse) are grouped together to indicate that a participant has not had a positive treatment response.


Original Secondary Outcome:

  • Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S; National Institute of Mental Health, 1985). The CGI-S is a 7-point Clinician Rating of Severity of Psychopathology. [ Time Frame: Screening, Baseline, Post-treatment, 3-month follow-up ]
  • Clinical Global Improvement (CGI; Guy, 1976). The CGI is a 7-point Rating of Treatment Response Anchored by 1 ("Very Much Improved) and 7 ("Very Much Worse"). [ Time Frame: Post-treatment, Follow-up ]


Information By: University of South Florida

Dates:
Date Received: April 14, 2009
Date Started: March 2009
Date Completion:
Last Updated: May 15, 2015
Last Verified: May 2015