Clinical Trial: Does Cap Assisted Colonoscopy Improve Detection of Adenomatous Polyps? (CAP Trial)

Study Status: Active, not recruiting
Recruit Status: Active, not recruiting
Study Type: Interventional

Official Title: Does Cap Assisted Colonoscopy Improve Detection of Adenomatous Polyps? (CAP Trial)

Brief Summary:

Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in cancer prevention relies on the detection and removal of adenomatous polyps. However, a substantial rate of adenomas is missed during a colonoscopy. It has been estimated that two thirds of missed adenomas are located on the proximal aspect of colonic folds. Attaching a transparent cap to the tip of a colonoscope may allow examination of the proximal aspect of colonic folds, and some early studies have suggested an increased polyp and adenoma detection using this technology. However, the studies have in part substantial methodological limitations (e.g. missing polyp histology, single endoscopist study, polyps not removed at the time of detection). Therefore, at this point it is unclear whether cap assisted colonoscopy may improve adenoma detection. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether cap assisted colonoscopy improves adenoma detection.

The investigators propose a two-center multiple endoscopists randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomized to cap assisted colonoscopy or standard high definition white light colonoscopy. The cap is a 4mm commercially available transparent cap that is attached to the tip of the colonoscopy. Primary outcome measure is the adenoma detection rate (mean number of adenoma per patient). The investigators will assess and adjust for possible variables that can affect adenoma detection, including withdrawal time and quality of colon preparation. As a secondary outcome of interest the investigators will evaluate a possible learning curve effect among all endoscopists (a minimum of six) new to this method. In addition the investigators will evaluate whether cap assisted endoscopy improves real time prediction of polyp histology.


Detailed Summary:

All patients who present for a colonoscopy and meet inclusion and exclusion criteria will be asked to participate (see inclusion and exclusion criteria). All patients will undergo a regular bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol lavage (based on current standard of care) until clear rectal fluid is evacuated. Patients will be randomized to one of two groups:

  1. Standard colonoscopy, or
  2. Cap assisted colonoscopy. All colonoscopies will be performed using state of the art high-definition wide angle colonoscopy. The transparent cap, which is attached to the tip of the colonoscope, has a 4mm margin extending beyond the tip of the colonoscope. All patients will undergo a careful endoscopic examination. A timer will provide feedback on the time of insertion and the withdrawal time. Detected polyps will be assessed with standard white light and narrow band imaging to predict polyp histology (adenoma versus no adenoma), then resected and sent for histological evaluation according to standard of care. At least 8 experienced endoscopists at the participating centers will participate. Each endoscopist will perform at least 50 cap assisted colonoscopies as part of the study. Each endoscopist will be asked to complete a survey after 10 and after 50 cap assisted colonoscopies.

Patients will be randomized in blocks of four allocated to each examiner. The order of randomization will be computer generated. Information on randomization will be contained in sealed envelopes assigned to each examiner and individually opened immediately before the procedure after a patient's All participating endoscopist will fill out a questionnaire regarding the use of cap assistance colonoscopy after the initial 10 cap assisted colonoscopies and after at least 50 cap assisted cap colo
Sponsor: White River Junction VAMC

Current Primary Outcome: Mean Number of Adenomas [ Time Frame: 1 year ]

Mean number of adenomas per patient in each group.


Original Primary Outcome: Same as current

Current Secondary Outcome:

  • Adenoma Detection Rate [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
    • Adenoma detection rate (ADR), % of patients with at least 1 adenoma
  • Advanced Adenoma Detection Rate [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
    Proportion of patients with advanced adenomas
  • Quality of Bowel Preparation [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
    Proportion of patients with a bowel preparation that was rated as good or excellent (four point scale that distinguishes the bowel prep as poor, fair, good or excellent).
  • Withdrawal Time [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
    • Time taken for the withdrawal of the colonoscope from the cecum to anus among patients, who did not have any polyps.
  • Ease of Terminal Ileum Intubation [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
    • Proportion of patients, for whom intubation of the terminal ileum with the colonoscope was rated as "easy". Intubation could be rated by the endoscopist as "easy", "slightly difficult", "difficult", or "unable to intubate".
  • Real Time Prediction of Polyp Histology [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
    Difference in recommended surveillance interval between real time polyp diagnosis and pathological diagnosis among patients with at least one diminutive polyp


Original Secondary Outcome: Same as current

Information By: White River Junction VAMC

Dates:
Date Received: January 19, 2012
Date Started: December 2010
Date Completion: December 2017
Last Updated: April 17, 2017
Last Verified: April 2017